ATLANTA (AP) - Georgia's top court ruled in favor of a transgender politician who was slapped with a lawsuit by two political opponents who claimed she misled voters by running as a female.
The Georgia Supreme Court's unanimous ruling on Monday found that the two political opponents who filed the lawsuit failed to produce evidence of fraud, misconduct or illegal action after claiming that Michelle Bruce bamboozled voters by identifying herself as a female.
Bruce, who was believed to be the state's first transgender politician, landed one of four council seats in Riverdale, Ga. in 2003. Running unopposed, she pledged to attract more jobs and residents to the struggling town 12 miles south of Atlanta.
Last year, however, three people signed up to run against her, and she failed to capture enough votes to avoid a runoff against second-place finisher Wayne Hall.
The third- and fourth-place finishers, Georgia Fuller and Stan Harris, filed a lawsuit after the primary that identified Bruce as "Michael" and sought a new election.
It's unclear whether most voters knew of Bruce's transgender status before the lawsuit was filed. She has declined to say whether she has had surgery, but said she always identified herself as transgender.
"I'm Michelle," she said when the suit was filed. "I'm the same Michelle they elected four years ago."
Hall won the runoff, and Bruce blamed the lawsuit for her defeat.
Meanwhile, the complaint made its way through Georgia's legal system. In its decision Monday, the court ruled for Bruce and concluded that "none of these alleged irregularities is specific enough to cast doubts" on the election.
Gay rights groups said the lawsuit appears to be the first in the country that accused an elected official of lying to the public because he or she is transgender.
"I am not aware of any other case involving the issue of whether a transgender candidate is defrauding the citizens," said Cole Thaler, an attorney with Lambda Legal, a gay rights group.
Bruce's attorneys said they felt vindicated by the ruling.
Michael King, the attorney for the plaintiffs, said he was disappointed and surprised by the decision.
"We think there were significant irregularities and misconduct to reverse the election," he said.
On the Net:
Georgia Supreme Court: http://www.gasupreme.us |